绿色混凝土丛林的灵魂

Today we launchSustainable Earth, a community-focused, open access journal where researchers, policy makers and citizens can read, discuss and promote ideas around sustainability and innovation. To mark the launch, we invited Robert McDonald, author of one thefirst published articlesto talk about his research on the role of nature in our cities.

This century will be remembered as the urban century, and our generation will be witness to the greatest migration in human history. By 2050, there will be 2.4 billion more people in cities, a rate of urban growth that is the equivalent of building a city the size of London every 7 weeks. But what, if anything, is the role for nature in this urban century? Does an urbanHomo sapienseven need nature anymore?

In arecent article inSustainable Earth, my coauthors and I reviewed three different academic disciplines to answer these questions. Taken together, we believe that trends in these three disciplines suggest that the urban century needs nature to succeed.

城市经济学探讨了为什么城市蓬勃发展。这项研究的主要主题是,邻近性是从人口密度较高的生活带来的互动潜力,具有其优势。正如亚里士多德所说,如果人类是社交动物,那样热爱互动,那么城市在某种意义上是人类的典型人,是互动的理想场所。许多经济研究表明,城市的邻近性增加导致生产力,创新和创造力的提高。

If cities are quintessentially human, they are also shockingly unnatural

Yet if cities are quintessentially human, they are also shockingly unnatural. Living in cities is correlated with an urban psychological penalty, manifest in higher rates of stress, psychosis, and depression. While there are a number of causes of this association, which we review in our article, one of the causes seems to be the increased interaction and stimulation that occurs in cities.

But a growing body of scientific evidence shows that parks and other natural features in cities can remove much of this psychological penalty, with onestudyin England finding 50% less depression and 43% less stress in neighborhoods with greater forest cover.

While the scientific evidence of nature’s mental health benefits is increasingly clear, cities globally remain mostly grey and dreary: we estimate in our article that while close to half of humanity lives at densities where the urban psychological penalty applies, only 13% of urban dwellers have enough nature around them to have a mental health benefit.

We conclude by arguing that nature in cities can be a way to have our cake and eat it too, to have all the benefits from urban proximity while have a lower urban psychological penalty. We believe that for the urban century to succeed, urban planners will have to incorporate nature into the very fabric of our cities.

查看有关生物学主页的最新帖子金博宝188

Comments