A peerless review? Automating methodological and statistical review
Peer review is the primary mechanism for ensuring the integrity of the published literature; however, it is a human system with all of a human's fallibilities.…Read more »
Peer review is the primary mechanism for ensuring the integrity of the published literature; however, it is a human system with all of a human's fallibilities.…Read more »
After years of hard work, linked clinical trials are here! It's now possible to link all published articles related to a clinical trial through the CrossMark…Read more »
How can the journal Research Integrity and Peer Review advance research and publication? Daniel Shanahan asked the Editors-in-Chief for their thoughts on what…Read more »
Transparency has been one of the defining trends in biomedical research over the last decade. However, as the recent case of Richmond Pharmacology Ltd vs the UK…Read more »
In a statement issued last week, the World Health Organization has added its voice to the growing demands for clinical trial transparency. But what will change,…Read more »
Is evidence-based medicine (EBM) actually working? Trisha Greenhalgh asked this in an editorial in the BMJ last year and this was the focus of the lively…Read more »
“No matter how complicated the research, or how brilliant the researcher, patients and the public always offer unique, invaluable insights. Their advice when…Read more »
No one ever said that doing a clinical trial was easy. Indeed it often feels like a Sisyphean task, when faced with obdurate funding committees, or centres that…Read more »
随着AllTrials倡议,EU Clinical Trials Regulation and the recent Tamiflu debacle, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have received…Read more »
‘On the 20th of May 1747, I took twelve patients in the scurvy, on board the Salisbury at sea. Their cases were as similar as I could have them.’ James Lind…Read more »